I randomly selected Kiss The Water on Netflix the other day and discovered that it is a really interesting documentary. It’s not compelling, on-the-edge-of-your-seat interesting but it’s really unique in both topic and style.
The story is about Megan Boyd, a niche artist who devoted her life to creating stunningly beautiful perfect flies for fly fishermen. I don’t know anything about fly fishing and didn’t even know that there was an art to this craft but it’s apparently a detailed thing. I love stories about people who commit their lives to something that no one in the mainstream world even knows much about so that kind of captured my interest.
The film itself is artistic as well. There are these beautiful shots of hands making the flies that are close-up and edgy and vibrantly colored. They’re quite striking. There are beautiful photographic landscape images caught from unusual angles (like through dirty windows)! And there is drawing/ animation incorporated into the film in really unique ways. It’s not something that you see every day and I give a lot of credit to the filmmaker for the work that went into making it.
Like I said, it’s not like every moment of this film was fascinating for me. Some of the interviews didn’t say much. Some of the artsy moments weren’t quite my thing. But overall it was inspiring to see the creativity that went into the film and the life that the film is describing.
If you Google “Walt Disney” and “Alice” you’ll get a lot of results for Alice in Wonderland. However, I learned from my trip to the Disney Museum that there was an earlier Alice in Disney’s work.
Early in his career (in the 1920s) Disney did silent film work. There was a popular series with a star named Alice (called the Alice Comedies). There were actually four different girls who played the character of Alice over the years, the most well-known of which was Virginia Davis.
Disney made the first Alice film on his own. He’d been doing some other films for Laugh-O-Gram but the company went bankrupt and Disney was trying to make some money. The main thing I learned at Disney Museum was how he was constantly having to reinvent himself and persevere through tough times to become what he was.
As you can see from the above image, these silent film comedies included the real love girl Alice but also included animation. The main animated character was a cat that resembled Felix the Cat.
More than fifty Alice movies were made in the four yeras between 1923 and 1927.
I thought I’d share a partial list of movies that were recommended to my Multicultural class (partial because it’s only for the current class, not the full course). I’ve only seen the first three on the list.
I just recently saw this film, which is about the BART station shooting. I couldn’t believe when I saw on the film that it happened in 2008. It feels so present here still. I was impressed with the film in the sense that it seemed to present the story as fairly or neutrally as possible, which had to have been tough to do with this controversial case.
I saw this movie a few times when it first came out and really loved it. I haven’t seen it since and do want to watch it again with an eye towards specifically why it was chosen for this course. Netflix also did a two-season TV show based on this movie, which I’d like to watch again.
It had been awhile since I’d been on Netflix so I decided to flip through and see what there was to see. I landed on Beautiful Darling, a documentary about Warhol Superstar Candy Darling.
There was a period when I got really fascinated by Warhol and read a lot of books about him and his art and The Factory and so I knew a bit about his superstars as a result but I don’t remember a lot about them really. What I do remember is mostly about Edie. And yet watching this documentary I couldn’t help but think that Candy Darling must have been the most fascinating of them all.
The thing about Candy Darling is that she’s truly, strikingly beautiful. And seemingly really talented as an actress, which can’t be said for all of the Warhol actors. And she’s a little tragic, in a Marilyn Monroe kind of way. At least, the documentary presents her as this star who exuded confidence and comfort in her own skin … and yet she was stuck in a body that didn’t feel right in a time when that wasn’t accepted at all and she seemed to desperately want a love that she never quite found.
Sometimes I really like when other people publish lists of things because it gives me something to work off of to learn something new. That was the case earlier this year when I saw Arch Daily’s article called The 30 Architecture Docs To Watch In 2013. I haven’t watched anything on the list yet but I came across the bookmark on my computer and got re-interested in working my way through the list. I think it would give me a great foundation in architecture, a design area that interests me but that I don’t know a whole lot about. A lot of them seem to be available online so I’ll start there. Have you seen any of them? Got any suggestions where to start?
As soon as I saw the 3D preview for Gatsby (when I went to go watch Oz the Great and Powerful, which I loved) I knew that it was a movie that I wanted to see. I went and saw it a couple of days ago at the Kabuki theater where I enjoyed the Gatsby Gimlet that they were serving at the bar. I got immersed into the movie and I’ve been mulling it over since. Was it the most amazing movie I’ve ever seen in my life? No, but I did like it a lot and there were many reasons why.
Here are ten things I liked about Gatsby:
1. Stunning 3D Effects
There were so many little details in the 3D effects that I loved. I’m a sucker for 3D movies. I’ll like almost anything in 3D honestly. I just get wrapped right up into the beauty of the imagery. This movie in particular did some cool things with the way trees hung in the foreground, confetti and snow fell into the crowd, curtains billowing and words were written onto the front of the screen.
2. Gorgeous Fashions and Style
They did a great job of showing off modern couture interpretations of the fashions of the Jazz Age in a gorgeous way in this movie. It was a delight to just look at those fashions. The hairstyles, the accessories; all of the details were delightful in every scene in the movie.
3. Movie of Male Friendship
I thought it was a really interesting portrayal of the friendship between the two main male characters. We just don’t see a lot of movies that are about that topic. The movie is about many different types of relationships and they’re all interesting and important but that’s a unique aspect that differs from most other love story movies.
4. Reveals Sad Truths About Human Relationships
There are so many things that the characters in the movie could have done differently to honor, cherish, celebrate and improve their relationships. But we are human and flawed and the different relationships displayed so many of the true ways in which we can be flawed in our relationships. It’s sad, but it’s touching.
5. Music Choices
The film is filled with music. What I loved was how there was this great combination of the influences from the jazz age in which the film is set with influences of totally contemporary 21st century rap and pop music. This could have turned out terribly if it wasn’t done well but I thought it was done great.
6. Terrific Cinematography
Yes, this goes hand-in-hand a bit with point #1 about the great 3D effects but just in general I thought the photographic choices that were made were terrific. There were excellent choices made with the right lighting, the boldness of color in certain spots, the close-up details of faces in some places … It was a visually stunning movie to watch. There were certain times in the film when the Blockbuster Movie style storyline did start to get a little boring for me but the film itself didn’t bore me because it was so pretty to watch.
7. Interconnectedness of the Characters
I loved the way that the stories of the different lives of the characters were woven together throughout the film. Some smart choices there in the storytelling.
8. Glimpse into the Jazz Age
My father is in love with the Jazz Age so I know a little bit about it from what he’s shared. I know a little bit also from research I’ve done at various times. I’m the first to admit that I don’t know a whole ton about it but it’s definitely an interesting time period that I’ll eventually delve into more. I don’t know enough to say how accurately the movie represented New York in the Jazz Age but it seemed like it hit some of the key points in interesting ways, revealing the sensuality and fun of the time along with some of the darker influences that emerged then.
9. The Humor
Gatsby is not a funny movie. It’s a drama, a romance … but there were certain humorous lines that caught me off guard and cracked me up. Humor is always nice.
10. Narrated Story
I’ve always loved movies that are narrated in part by one of the characters. It’s a terrific storytelling technique that always endears a movie to me.
When my sister was here we went to Golden Gate Park and one of the things we saw while we were there was the National AIDS Memorial Grove. I actually hadn’t visited before even though I’ve been to the park many times. It’s a HUGE park and there’s tons to see there. The grove is a really magical space, though, with beautiful plants and water features, so I’m glad I finally checked it out.
“The National AIDS Memorial Grove, located in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park, is a dedicated space in the national landscape where millions of Americans touched directly or indirectly by AIDS can gather to heal, hope, and remember. For all the promising prospects on the horizon, AIDS continues to invade our lives, violate our past, and rob us of our comfortable assumptions about the future. The sacred ground of this living memorial honors all who have confronted this tragic pandemic both those who have died and those who have shared their struggle, kept the vigils, and supported each other during the final hours.”
Photos from National AIDS Memorial Grove
In sort-of-related news, I’ve seen a couple of good documentaries lately about HIV/ AIDS. I already told you about When We Were Here, which I definitely recommend. The other one I saw recently was called How to Survive a Plague and is a documentary about ACT UP, the grassroots organization that strived to get medical care for people with HIV/AIDS starting in the 1980s. Powerful stuff!
I recently watched When We Were Here, which is a documentary available on Netflix that chronciles the experience of the AIDS crisis in San Francisco in the early 1980s. It was touching, informative and interesting. There were many things that I kinda-sorta-knew about that time period but this film really tied them all together and gave a clearer picture of what it was like to live through that time.
Basics of the Film
The film interviews five people. They come from various backgrounds and experiences … some were very involved in the health politics of the crisis and others were not … but what they have in common is that they all lived through the AIDS crisis in the Castro in the 1980′s and were intimately touched by the experience in one way or another.
It Was the Numbers that Shocked Me
The film reveals many touching stories and details that could wrench your heart out but for some reason it was the numbers and statitsics revealed in the movie that really got my attention. Some of the things I learned from the film:
It is believed that AIDS came to San Francisco around 1976 but there wasn’t an AIDS test until about five years later. By the time there was a test, approximately 50% of the gay men in San Francisco tested positive.
In the ~10 year time span between the first real awareness of AIDS and the time when real treatment became available more than 15,000 people in San Francisco (mostly gay men, many living in the small Castro neighborhood) died from the disease.
The film also has these really poignant images where it shows the obituaries of person after person after person. The Bay Area Reporter would just have pages of pages of headshots of those who were killed by the disease. While this is an image, it’s also about the numbers because of the way it’s laid out.
Things I Knew But Saw a Different Way
For some reason I know a lot of secondhand information about this period of time even though I never set out to learn about it. Even before moving here I’d read a number of memoirs/ anthologies of stories from that time. And maybe it’s just part of growing up as a teen in the 90′s that we learned about AIDS. Once I moved here I met a lot of people who had lived through it. One of the things that I’ve heard again and again from people is that during the early days they had friends dying literally every week. This is reiterated again in the film – one man in particular talks about losing his partner and then his best friend in a two week span. But for some reason I had never really thought about exactly what this meant until I watched the movie. I can’t imagine if all of the friends I have here in the city were dead next year. I just can’t even begin to imagine what that would be like and this was happening to so many people here at this time. I had heard people compare it to going through a war, a reference also made in the film, and after watching the documentary I kind of understand why they would say that.
Another thing I knew but really understood better after watching the film was that the community here really had to come together around this crisis. For a long time AIDS was considered a “gay disease” and this didn’t just bring stigma but also a host of problems related to that stigma. For one thing, the larger medical and political community wasn’t necessarily in a rush to solve a problem that they didn’t see as being related to them. People were dying these horrific deaths that had no cure and it was up to those same people to come together to find a cure because no one else was doing it. A related point made in the film was that it was during this time that the lesbian and gay communities really began to come together for the first time in a big way in part because with so many gay men dying around them the lesbian community stepped up and helped care for these guys.
Of course, things weren’t just hunky dory … even while the community came together there was obviously some dissent between people with differing beliefs. One example that the film brings up is that once the larger world decided to respond to the AIDS crisis they did some things that posed a risk to civil rights. This was easily a time when a backlash could occur against gay rights. So one of the things they wanted to do was shut down all of the bathhouses, which they saw as a breeding ground for the disease. Some members of the gay community were fine with this and others felt like this was a civil rights issue. So the community had to find ways to come together and fight for rights related to AIDS, health care, etc. even though there were aspects of the developing situation that not all members of the community agreed upon. (Of course, this was the case in many different areas of civil rights, not just around the AIDS crisis … such as in issues where women had to find their place in a larger civil rights movement and then minority women had to figure out their place in all of that … but it was intensified by the fact that it was happening around this huge health crisis.
Some Random Fun Facts
I am one of those San Franciscans who always gets a little thrill when I see my city in movies of any kind. And I always like learning new facts that are more “insider information”. So there were random things in this film that I liked for that. For example, I learned that Under One Roof was almost named AIDSmart. Under One Roof is an organization that sells retail items with proceeds going to AIDS organizations. I know about it (and have shopped there during the holiday season) because a friend volunteers there. So it’s one of those local things that I now know this random tidbit about that I didn’t know before.
Conclusion: This is a film that tells some really great personal stories while sharing great educational information about the AIDS epidemic of the 1980s. Totally worth a watch.
I didn’t do too well with my plan to watch classic romance films in February. I watched Breakfast at Tiffany’s for the first time and loved it and then didn’t really watch any others. That’s okay. For March I decided to go with a film category that it is one of my favorites: documentaries.
So far I’ve watched:
Grizzly Man is the true story of Timothy Treadwell who went and lived up close and personal with Alaska’s wild bears for thirteen summers in a row but that ended tragically when he and his girlfriend were eaten alive. It’s a traditional documentary that combines Treadwell’s own footage with narration of the story and interviews with those people who were involved in some way.
Awful Normal reminds me a bit more of some of the experimental documentaries I watched a little of in January. It’s the true story of two adult women who were molested as girls by a family friend and their journey to go confront him to get closure. There are some odd film moments such as when they turn the camera off at the man’s request but keep the audio rolling so you only see a black screen. All in all, I felt like it was a powerful documentary with truth at the heart of it.